Publicación:
Analysis of the students’ interactions and satisfaction during a Collaborative Lab Project

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorEcheverría Rodríguez, Leovyspa
dc.contributor.authorCobos, Ruthspa
dc.contributor.authorMachuca, Lilianaspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-20 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-17T20:20:02Z
dc.date.available2019-01-20 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-06-17T20:20:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-20
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this paper is to present the students' interactions and satisfaction in a Collaborative Lab Project supported by a Teaching Assistant System-TASystem. The goal of the developed TASystem is twofold: a) to assist the instructors with the design of collaborative learning activities in Learning Management Systems-LMS and b) to help the students when performing this type of activities in these systems. The TASystem was embedded into the LMS Moodle. In order to carry out this study, a research methodology was defined. Students from the School of Engineering at the Universidad del Valle-UNIVALLE (Colombia) took part in the research study. The mainly presented results in this research study showed that the students were motivated to interact and collaborate with their classmates in a small group level. And that most of the students were satisfied when using the TASystem in Moodle.spa
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this paper is to present the students' interactions and satisfaction in a Collaborative Lab Project supported by a Teaching Assistant System-TASystem. The goal of the developed TASystem is twofold: a) to assist the instructors with the design of collaborative learning activities in Learning Management Systems-LMS and b) to help the students when performing this type of activities in these systems. The TASystem was embedded into the LMS Moodle. In order to carry out this study, a research methodology was defined. Students from the School of Engineering at the Universidad del Valle-UNIVALLE (Colombia) took part in the research study. The mainly presented results in this research study showed that the students were motivated to interact and collaborate with their classmates in a small group level. And that most of the students were satisfied when using the TASystem in Moodle.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.identifier.doi10.24050/reia.v16i31.1256
dc.identifier.eissn2463-0950
dc.identifier.issn1794-1237
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.eia.edu.co/handle/11190/5055
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v16i31.1256
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherFondo Editorial EIA - Universidad EIAspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.eia.edu.co/index.php/reveia/article/download/1256/1230
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 31 , Año 2019spa
dc.relation.citationendpage223
dc.relation.citationissue31spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage209
dc.relation.citationvolume16spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista EIAspa
dc.relation.referencesAbraham, D. and Yacef, K. (2002) ‘Adaptation in the Web-based Logic-ITA’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2347, pp. 456–461. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78549275573&partnerID=40&md5=a372e0d7c4ceee9ef76db65b5a5bf2b6.eng
dc.relation.referencesAl-Ajlan, A. and Zedan, H. (2008) ‘Why Moodle’, 2008 12th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 58–64. doi: 10.1109/FTDCS.2008.22.eng
dc.relation.referencesBlackboard (2015). Available at: http://es.blackboard.com/sites/international/globalmaster/ (Accessed: 1 January 2015).eng
dc.relation.referencesVan Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J. and Kanselaar, G. (2000) ‘Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge’, Learning and Instruction, 10(4), pp. 311–330. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5.eng
dc.relation.referencesClaroline (2015). Available at: http://www.claroline.net/ (Accessed: 1 January 2015).eng
dc.relation.referencesClaros, I. et al. (2014) ‘Towards a Collaborative Pedagogical Model in MOOCs’, in 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 905–911.eng
dc.relation.referencesClaros, I., Echeverria, L. and Cobos, R. (2015) ‘Towards MOOCs scenaries based on collaborative learning approaches’, in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2015 IEEE, pp. 989–992. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096093.eng
dc.relation.referencesCosta, C., Alvelos, H. and Teixeira, L. (2012) ‘The Use of Moodle e-learning Platform: A Study in a Portuguese University’, Procedia Technology, 5, pp. 334–343. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.037.eng
dc.relation.referencesDiez, F. and Cobos, R. (2008) ‘A case study of a cooperative learning experiment in Artificial Intelligence’, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 15(4), pp. 308–316. doi: 10.1002/cae.20114.eng
dc.relation.referencesDillenbourg, P. et al. (1996) ‘The evolution of research on collaborative learning’, Learning, pp. 189–211. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.92.2555&rep=rep1&type=pdf.eng
dc.relation.referencesDillenbourg, P. (1999) ‘What do you mean by â€TM collaborative learning ’?’, Collaborative learning Cognitive and computational approaches, 1(6), pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1.1.167.4896.eng
dc.relation.referencesDokeos (2015). Available at: http://www.dokeos.com/ (Accessed: 12 June 2017).eng
dc.relation.referencesEcheverria, L. (2017) UNA PROPUESTA DE UNA PLATAFORMA DE APRENDIZAJE BASADA EN ESCENARIOS COLABORATIVOS PARA LA REALIZACIÓN DE EXPERIENCIAS DE APRENDIZAJE MIXTO CON SOPORTE A LA INVESTIGACIÓN, Tesis doctoral. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.eng
dc.relation.referencesEcheverría, L. (2011) Motivation Booster based on the monitoring of users’ progress in collaborative learning scenarios. Trabajo Fin de Master, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.eng
dc.relation.referencesEcheverría, L. et al. (2017) ‘Using collaborative learning scenarios to teach programming to non-CS majors’, Computer applications in engineering education, 25(3), pp. 1–13.eng
dc.relation.referencesEcheverría, L. and Cobos, R. (2015) ‘Designing the assessment of the collaborative learning process in LMS courses’, in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 19th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), pp. 218–223.eng
dc.relation.referencesEcheverría, L., Cobos, R. and Buendía, S. (2013) ‘A Teaching Assistant for task and assessment management in Collaborative Learning Scenarios’, in Octavo Congreso Colombiano de Computación-8CCC 2013, pp. 26–29.eng
dc.relation.referencesEcheverría, L., Cobos, R. and Morales, M. (2013) ‘Designing and evaluating collaborative learning scenarios in Moodle LMS Courses’, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering, pp. 61–66.eng
dc.relation.referencesKoschmann, T. (2008) ‘Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction’, Radiologic technology, 80(1), pp. 67–74. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23032751.eng
dc.relation.referencesKumar, S., Gankotiya, A. K. and Dutta, K. (2011) ‘A comparative study of moodle with other e-learning systems’, in ICECT 2011 - 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, pp. 414–418. doi: 10.1109/ICECTECH.2011.5942032.eng
dc.relation.referencesLesta, L. and Yacef, K. (2002) ‘An intelligent teaching assistant system for Logic’, Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_45.eng
dc.relation.referencesMartín, M. et al. (2008) ‘Generating teacher adapted suggestions for improving distance educational systems with SIgMa’, in Proceedings - The 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2008, pp. 449–453. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2008.227.eng
dc.relation.referencesMoodle (2015). Available at: https://moodle.org/ (Accessed: 1 January 2015).eng
dc.relation.referencesPerikos, I., Grivokostopoulou, F. and Hatzilygeroudis, I. (2011) ‘TEACHING ASSISTANT TOOLS FOR NL TO FOL CONVERSION’, in IADIS International Conference e-Learning, pp. 337–344.eng
dc.relation.referencesPifarre, M. and Cobos, R. (2010) ‘Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment’, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), pp. 237–253. doi: 10.1007/s11412-010-9084-6.eng
dc.relation.referencesPloetzner, R. et al. (1999) ‘Learning by Explaining to Oneself and to Others’, Collaborative-learning; Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 103–121.eng
dc.relation.referencesQueirós, R. and Leal, J. (2012) ‘PETCHA: a programming exercises teaching assistant’, Proc. ITiCSE 2012, pp. 192–197. doi: 10.1145/2325296.2325344.eng
dc.relation.referencesRisko, E. F. et al. (2013) ‘The collaborative lecture annotation system (CLAS): A new TOOL for distributed learning’, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(1), pp. 4–13. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2012.15.eng
dc.relation.referencesRivera, D. and Machuca, L. (2014) ‘A Virtual Assistant Architecture to support the delivery of texts in languages teaching - learning processes’, Ingeniería y Competitividad, 16(2), pp. 155–164.eng
dc.relation.referencesSakai (2018). Available at: https://sakaiproject.org/ (Accessed: 12 July 2018).eng
dc.relation.referencesSmith, L. and Macgregor, J. T. (1992) What is Collaborative Learning ?, Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education.eng
dc.relation.referencesVélez, J. (2009) Pelican. Una plataforma para el diseño y desarrollo de escenarios de aprendizaje colaborativo. Soporte a los aspectos dinámicos. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.eng
dc.relation.referencesVillegas, L. E. M. and Carrillo, P. J. R. (2011) ‘Experiences in developing an e-learning system for language learning and teaching’, in 2011 6th Colombian Computing Congress (CCC). IEEE, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/COLOMCC.2011.5936281.eng
dc.relation.referencesWebb, N. M. (1991) ‘Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), pp. 366–389. doi: 10.2307/749186.eng
dc.relation.referencesYacef, K. (2005) ‘The Logic-ITA in the classroom: a medium scale experiment’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 15(1), pp. 41–60.eng
dc.rightsRevista EIA - 2019eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2eng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/eng
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.eia.edu.co/index.php/reveia/article/view/1256eng
dc.subjectcollaborative learningeng
dc.subjectMoodleeng
dc.subjectstudent-to-student interactionseng
dc.subjectstudents' satisfactioneng
dc.subjectTASystemeng
dc.titleAnalysis of the students’ interactions and satisfaction during a Collaborative Lab Projectspa
dc.title.translatedAnalysis of the students’ interactions and satisfaction during a Collaborative Lab Projecteng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85eng
dc.type.contentTexteng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Colecciones
Revista EIA (Portal de Revistas)